Infrastructure as Market Design: Location and Technology Choice on the Electric Grid
When infrastructure shifts equilibrium entry, what infrastructure policy maximizes welfare?
Abstract
If benefits to infrastructure vary by firm, shifting infrastructure availability will change the equilibrium level and location of entry. I study this channel in the context of the Texas electric grid, where electric transmission is scarce and renewable resource quality varies by region and technology. I solve a dynamic entry game for renewable generators, capturing spatial and technological entry margins. Embedded within my entry game is a physically realistic model of electricity dispatch, where electricity flows and prices are endogenous. The model is based on a new dataset (2018–2024) with generation, transmission capacity, and demand information. I find that limited transmission capacity and spatially concentrated wind resources suppress wind entry, while solar generators respond to limited transmission capacity by entering less sunny regions with fewer transmission constraints. I explore two counterfactuals—one where entrants pay for grid upgrades, and one where grid operators run a market for new transmission—under fixed demand and data-center-driven demand growth. I find that the market for new transmission generates more welfare than the Texas or entrant-funded upgrade policies, and that both non-market policies yield inefficiently low and spatially distorted entry choices.